01
U.S. COURTS ARE ALREADY USING AI FOR SUPPORT WORK
The federal judiciary's AI task force describes real uses — processing handwritten filings, procedural checks, staff assistance — while warning against handing judicial functions to the machine. The debate isn't AI or no AI. It's which tasks, which guardrails.
02
COURT GUIDANCE EMPHASIZES LOW-RISK USE FIRST
The National Center for State Courts says: start with low-risk tasks, write the governance down, keep humans reviewing, handle privacy and vendors carefully. The closer the tool gets to the verdict, the tighter the leash.
03
JUDICIAL GUIDANCE PUTS RESPONSIBILITY BACK ON THE JUDGE
Updated guidance for judges in England and Wales flags hallucinations, bias, and confidentiality — and stresses personal responsibility for anything issued in a judicial office holder's name. Using AI doesn't move the blame to the machine.
04
AI ERRORS IN LEGAL FILINGS ARE NOW COMMON ENOUGH TO CHANGE COURT RULES
Courts keep tripping over fabricated or defective AI-assisted filings — prompting new certification and review rules, and repeated sanctions on lawyers who didn't check the output. The verification problem is already operational.