01
WORKERS WHO TRUST AI MORE THINK LESS — BY THEIR OWN REPORT
A 2025 Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon study surveyed 319 knowledge workers about 936 real cases of generative-AI use. More confidence in the AI lined up with less reported critical thinking; more confidence in themselves lined up with more. Self-reported and observational — about work practices, not proof AI lowers intelligence.
02
THE THINKING MAY SHIFT, NOT VANISH
The same study found workers describing a shift: less gathering information, more verifying it; less solving directly, more integrating AI responses; less executing tasks, more stewarding them. AI can move cognitive effort instead of removing it — but verification is itself a skill.
03
AI MEASURABLY RESHAPES REAL WORK PATTERNS
A randomized field experiment with more than 6,000 workers found generative-AI access changed work patterns: less time on email, faster document work, meeting time mostly unchanged. Offloading creates measurable efficiency without saying whether long-term skill goes up or down.
04
GPS ALREADY SHOWED WHAT OFFLOADING DOES TO MEMORY
A longitudinal navigation study found heavier habitual GPS use lined up with worse spatial-memory performance and steeper later decline. GPS isn't generative AI. But it's a decent warning that delegating a cognitive task can change the skill underneath.