The story behind the cartoon
South Korea's Supreme Court published a survey of 360 judges: 80.7 percent had encountered citations of precedents that do not exist, 65.4 percent had seen false accounts of real precedents, and 16.9 percent had seen false or nonexistent laws.
The bench is implicated too: 164 judges acknowledged having themselves cited false precedents, while 57.6 percent said lawyers for parties had cited false precedents or other AI-generated inaccurate information.
Nearly 92 percent said institutional measures are urgently needed, including fines, mandatory verification, and discipline.
The law books are now haunted: the precedent looks solid, cites beautifully, and vanishes the moment a judge reaches for it.

