FIELD GUIDE · RIGHTS, WELFARE & DIGITAL MINDS
Before you laugh: serious researchers are already asking whether future models deserve moral consideration. Before you panic: nobody has proved today's chatbots feel a thing.
UPDATED 2026-10-12
TL;DR
01
Anthropic announced a model-welfare research program in 2025, explicitly framing AI consciousness and experience as open questions rather than settled facts. This moved from sci-fi into actual lab governance.
02
The 2024 report Taking AI Welfare Seriously argues there is a realistic possibility that some future AI systems could be conscious and/or robustly agentic and recommends early assessment and policy preparation. The argument is precaution under uncertainty — not a claim that current models are definitely conscious.
03
Anil Seth's work on biological naturalism argues current digital AI is unlikely to be conscious on that theory, while leaving open more brain-like or life-like artificial systems. Whether computation alone is enough is still an active scientific and philosophical fight.
KEEP READING
NEXT FIELD GUIDE →SHOULD CHILDREN HAVE AI FRIENDS?The friend never sleeps, never judges, never gets bored — and it's a product. New enough that nobody gets to pretend they know the ending.A billionaire who builds surveillance software fears a world government promising protection. Douthat pressed him in 2025. Then came the secret lectures, the pope, the AI safetyists — and an Iran-war break with Trump.
Peter Thiel made his fortune on the internet and keeps insisting the internet was not enough. Flying cars, Mars, AI, longevity and the meaning of progress — the other half of his worldview.
Washington is trying to choke off China's AI — chip bans, blacklists, and now Taiwan making smuggling a crime. Beijing just returned the favor, locking down its own AI exports. Meanwhile the models keep getting cheaper, better, and closer together. A field guide to the argument over whether the race protects anyone, or just speeds everything up.
SHOW YOUR WORK
Nobody has proved the machine can suffer. That is exactly why the argument is uncomfortable.